Preview

Bibliosphere

Advanced search

Carbon nanostructures: scientometric analysis for 2000-2015 (part 1)

https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-4-101-107

Abstract

The article presents a scientometric analysis of the development of the carbon nanotechnology (NT) direction for 2000-2015 with the participation of 30 most active countries. It shows shifting the world research center to the Asian region, both on volume and quality indicators. Using the concept of a national research portfolio gives deep characteristics of different countries behavior in the course of scientific rivalry. Due to the strong skewness of the citation distributions, preference is given to the percentile-based indicators, such as: the contribution of a country to the world top-10% (top-1%) of the most highly cited publications, the share of such publications in the country's total output, the highly cited papers index, etc. Relying on them, the author fully discloses the scientific «offensive» of the «newcomer» countries on the «incumbents» ones (e.g. China on the USA, South Korea on Germany, Iran on Russia), the phenomenon of Singapore as an effective producer of highly cited publications on the carbon nanostructures, and international co-authorship in the top-1% segment of the most cited articles. Russia's positions are studied in detail, the main domestic research participants are established, and based on bibliometric criteria the center of scientific excellence in the field of graphene is identified. The paper characterizes the supporting role of a number of national science foundations in the NT carbon direction development using data of WoS. The author used the Science Citation Index Expanded database for the initial bibliographic sampling; information of science foundations of Russia and the USA, as well as patent organizations of Russia (Rospatent) and the world (WIPO) for additional comparison.

About the Author

A. I. Terekhov
Central Economic-Mathematical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature, 1991, 354 (6348), 56-58.

2. Novoselov K. S., Geim A. K., Morozov S. V., Jiang D., Zhang Y., Dubonos S. V., Grigorieva I. V., Firsov A. A. Electric field in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 2004, 306 (5296), 666-669.

3. Kroto H. W., Heath J. R., O’Brein S. C., Curl R. F., Smalley R. E. C60: buckminsterfullerene. Nature, 1985, 318 (6042), 162-163.

4. Plume A. Buckyballs, nanotubes and graphene: on the hunt for the next big thing. Research Trends, 2010, 18, 5-7.

5. Noorden R. Chemistry: the trial of new carbon. Nature, 2011, 469 (7328), 14-16.

6. Milanez D. H., Schiavi M. T., Do Amaral R. M., Faria L. I. L., Gregolin J. A. R. Development of carbon-based nanomaterials indicators using the analytical tools and data provided by the web of science database. Materials Research, 2013, 16 (6), 1282-1293.

7. Braun T., Schubert A. P., Kostoff R. N. Growth and trends of fullerene research as reflected in its journal literature. Chemical Reviews, 2000, 100 (1), 23-38.

8. Marx W., Barth A. Carbon nanotubes - a scientometric study. Carbon nanotubes. Vukovar, 2010, 1-17.

9. Munoz-Sandoval E. Trends in nanoscience, nanotechnology, and carbon nanotubes: a bibliometric approach. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2014, 16 (1), 1-22.

10. Barth A., Marx W. Graphene - a rising star in view of scientometrics. 2008. URL: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0808/ 0808.3320.pdf (accessed 14.05.2017).

11. Lyu P. H., Wang G-F., Wan Y., Liu J., Liu Q., Ma F. Bibliometric trend analysis on global graphene research. Scientometrics, 2011, 88 (2), 399-419.

12. Plume A. Graphene: ten years of the ‘gold rush’. Research Trends, 2014, 38, 13-15.

13. Терехов А. И., Мирабян Л. М., Мамаев В. Л. Комплексный подход к оценке развития научного направления с использованием компьютерных баз данных // Вестник РФФИ. 2002. № 2. С. 47-57 ; Terekhov A. I., Mirabyan L. M., Mamaev V. L. A comprehensive approach to assess the development of the scientific direction using computer databases. Vestnik RFFI, 2002, 2, 47-57. (In Russ.).

14. Terekhov A. I., Efremenkova V. M., Stankevich I. V., Krukovskaya N. V., Terekhov A. A. Information resources for evaluating the development of research direction - «fullerenes». Fullerenes, Nanotubes, and Carbon Nanostructures, 2006, 14, 2/3, 579-584.

15. Терехов А. И. Анализ процессов развития нанотехнологии (на примере углеродных наноструктур) // Экономика и математические методы. 2009. Т. 45, № 3. С. 12-27 ; Terekhov A. I. Analysis of the nanotechnology process development (a case of carbon nanostructures). Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 2009, 45 (3), 12--27. (In Russ.).

16. UNCTAD handbook of statistic / Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations conference on trade and development. UNCTAD handbook of statistics. 2006. Geneva, 2007. 471 p. URL: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/tdstat31_en.pdf (accessed 12.04.2017).

17. Tijssen R. J. W., Visser M. S., Van Leeuwen T. N. Benchmarking international scientific excellence: are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 2002, 54 (3), 381-397.

18. Terekhov A. I. Bibliometric spectroscopy of Russia's nanotechnology: 2000-2014. Scientometrics, 2017, 110 (3), 1217-1242.

19. King D. A. The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 2004, 430 (6997), 311-316.


Review

For citations:


Terekhov A.I. Carbon nanostructures: scientometric analysis for 2000-2015 (part 1). Bibliosphere. 2017;(4):101-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2017-4-101-107

Views: 393


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1815-3186 (Print)
ISSN 2712-7931 (Online)